Competitive edge across basic metals, textiles and apparel, renewable energy, and chemical products |
Indian manufacturers have lagged in transitioning to advanced technologies and have limited know-how in advanced manufacturing, particularly in sectors such as electronics, semi-conductors, and renewable energy components.
India's manufacturing productivity lags peers': Indonesia’s is twice of India's, while China’s and South Korea’s is four times higher.
From $ 500-550 Bn in 2022
1200-1300/7500-7600 Nominal GDP ($ Bn) by 2030/ 2047 |
From 50-60 Mn jobs in 2022
60-70 Job creation (Mn jobs) by 2030 |
From 5-6 lighthouses in 2022
50-70 Lighthouses in WEF by 2030 |
From 7-8% in 2022
9-10% Real GDP growth (%) by 2047 |
3x of large firms in 2021
700-750 Number of large firms by 2030 |
From 35-40% in 2022
50-60% /70-80% Digital adoption by MSME(%) by 2030/ 2047 |
From $120-140 Bn in 2021
400-420 Exports ($ Bn) by 2030 |
From 25-30% in 2021
10-15% Import localization by 2030 |
These programs could encompass sharing of technology licenses and know-how, mentorship opportunities, and partnerships to manufacture value-added offerings linked to the core product (e.g., EV companies could help their MSME suppliers develop informatics, safety systems, and battery management systems).
Key actors: Large companies and conglomerates (annual revenues >USD 500 million)
Large corporations can explore supplier grants for development of breakthrough innovations in advanced manufacturing. To support this, a National Manufacturing Technologies Mission could identify technology gaps across sectors and facilitate the acquisition and transfer of manufacturing technologies through international JVs and alliances
Key actors: Large companies and conglomerates (annual revenues >USD 500 million), with support from industry bodies like FICCI and ELCINA
These partnerships could be aimed at incorporating IoT-based assembly line and distribution productivity enhancements (such as digital twins, chatbots, RPA-based automated maintenance, and 3D printing) to enhance operational efficiency across key metrics (yield, quality, cycle time etc.)
Key actors: At-scale manufacturers (annual revenues of >USD 50 million)
At-scale manufacturers could upskill or reskill their employees with latest manufacturing technologies (such as computer-aided technologies, product design, etc.) through tie-ups with academic institutions and digital training platforms.
These programs could be complemented by digital centers of excellence (created under the ambit of industry skill councils).
Key actors: At-scale manufacturers (annual revenues of >USD 50 million), with support from industry skill councils (e.g., NSDC)
Manufacturers could promote circularity (e.g., battery waste reuse) by creating recycling hubs and leveraging shared infrastructure. They could also prioritize the creation of green alternatives to existing products, through sustainable packaging, green building materials, etc.
To support this, industry bodies could define a standard for “green” labels and establish a robust auditing process for green products.
Key actors: Manufacturers in the sustainability industry (e.g., makers of solar panels and EVs), with support from FICCI, EESL and other industry bodies
The central government could facilitate globally competitive manufacturing hubs in high-potential sectors (like electronics and capital goods, chemicals, textiles and apparel).
State governments could support efforts by creating plug-and-play cluster zones based on their manufacturing strengths. For example, Nagpur could become a world-class efficient logistics zone for manufacturing in electronics and aeronautics.
Key actors: Central and state governemnts
Accelerating growth of economy by PLI scheme and increasing effectiveness by encouraging component eco-system, offering investment-linked incentives for capital-intensive and sunrise sectors (e.g., ACC Batteries, EVs, hydrogen fuel cell), targeting unexplored sectors such as white goods/industrial goods and including other segments in already announced PLI sectors such as all components under electronics (e.g., UPS, Solar invertors) , CDMO/CRAMS manufacturing in Chemicals scheme.
Key actors: Central government
India could strengthen infrastructure in key manufacturing hubs through PPPs and SPVs and expand smart-city coverage. It could also utilize new technologies to provide essential utilities (e.g., it could facilitate off-grid rural market electrification through solar infra).
Key actors: State and central governments
The central government could create a one-stop shop for clearances and industry queries through an e-governance platform. This would reduce project delays and costs as well as digitize the compliance process (by implementing BRAP, expanding the use of e-signatures, etc.).
Key actors: Central government
Through collaborations with commercial banks, the EXIM bank could support large transactions and reinsurance programs and extend export financing for both pre- and post-shipment stages
Key actors: Central government